Shane Maddock on the Ongoing Delusion of Nuclear Safety
In his most recent post at the SHAFR blog, he addresses the recent disaster in Japan. He begins:
The devastating earthquake and tsunami that hit Japan on March 11 has once again cast nuclear power in a negative light. Fukushima Dai-Ichi has now joined Three-Mile Island and Chernobyl as warnings of an even-more devastating nuclear disaster that could lie in our future. In each instance, the public received assurance that the accident was simply an aberration. Nuclear power’s defenders assure all who will listen that most reactors are safe and nuclear accidents are rare. Pressed to respond to the U.S. public’s fears about radiation expelled from the damaged Japanese reactors, President Obama has reiterated his administration’s commitment to building new nuclear plants both to help the United States lessen its dependence on foreign sources of energy and to reduce the production of greenhouse gases contributing to global climate change. New regulations and safety procedures, he assured, would prevent Three-Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushimi Dai-Ichi from reoccurring. The president seems to have learned little from his embarrassing assertions about the safety of deep-water oil drilling in 2010 just days before the BP oil rig disaster began in the Gulf of Mexico.
There would be no nuclear industry in the U.S. if it weren’t for government funding, says Maddock:
In 2007, renewable energy development attracted $71 billion in private investment while nuclear power received nothing. If not for government aid, the nuclear power industry would already be just a memory in the United States.
And why don’t private companies want to fund nuclear power? Two words: radioactive waste.
Maddock goes further to explore national security risks and how Obama’s insistence to keep funding nuclear power undermines America’s policy of limiting the spread of nuclear weapons.
Read Maddock’s full post, “Time to End the Nuclear Power Delusion.”