Slavery and the NBA?
As an educator, I know that few Americans have any substantive knowledge of the history of chattel slavery. It’s been disheartening to see the discussion quickly disintegrate into a simplistic debate concerning whether or not the NBA is really just a form of modern slavery where the majority of “black laborers” are unjustly controlled by “white owners.” Although elements like the draft and trades made from team to team lend themselves to hyperbolic comparison to slavery, it’s a comparison that fails to account for the extreme nature of the lived experience of American slavery.
The enslaved African American ancestors of most of today’s NBA players suffered from an extreme deprivation of basic rights. Slaves performed the most grueling work for no pay; they were provided only the subsistence necessary to support life. Slaves had no ability to improve their status or the status of their children through hard work. In fact, according to the slave codes that governed southern states, slaves could not take advantage of the most basic freedoms most Americans take for granted like raising their own children, gathering to worship, learning to read, or even entering into the most basic legal contracts.
There was certainly an ugly tone in Gilbert’s letter, and such a tone should be condemned. However, it was just a tone. Slavery was an all-encompassing, constitutionally enforced system. LeBron James is a free man, he freely chose to determine where he would work, where he and his family will live, and the best way to carve out his own future. I, for one, am thankful that none of this has anything to do with slavery.
Blair L. M. Kelley is associate professor of history at North Carolina State University and author of Right to Ride: Streetcar Boycotts and African American Citizenship in the Era of Plessy v. Ferguson.
Ed. note: This piece also appears at Salon.com. And an update: Dan Gilbert was fined $100,000 by NBA Commissioner David Stern.